Saturday, July 5, 2008

A view on Oil.............

Friends,
I read this article somewhere else and has pasted for the readers to have a look and understand what is going on in Crude and Commodities market.....

Oil Price: Fixing The Blame. Not The Problem

All those speculators getting the blame for driving up the price of oil these days - just who are they? For part of the answer, look in the mirror.

The retirement savings of workers across the country, entrusted to pension fund managers, are being plowed into one of the few investments that has delivered phenomenal returns in recent years.

For decades, futures contracts were mostly traded by commodity producers and the people who used the actual products, such as crude oil, corn and soybeans. Agreeing to a price today for a commodity to be delivered in, say, two months is a way to smooth out price fluctuations for those supplies.

But large investors faced with the threat of inflation have increasingly used them as protection against the falling dollar. That includes pension funds, along with investment banks, mutual funds and private hedge funds.

Research firm Ennis Knupp and Associates says $139 billion had been funneled into energy commodites, primarily crude oil, by the end of March - and it estimates more than half of that is from retirement money.

The investments have paid off. The Standard & Poor's GSCI index, which tracks a basket of commodities, is up 19 percent in the past five years, compared with just 9 percent for the S&P 500 stock index.

The risk is that if the remarkable run in oil and other futures markets reverses course, billions of dollars of retirement benefits could be wiped out.

"A pension fund is supposed to be investing money in secure, stable investments for the benefit of the people whose money they are investing," said Dan Lippe, an energy analyst at Houston-based Petral Consulting Inc.

"When we hit that wall and things start falling," he said, "they will fall very fast, and the pension funds that invested in commodities will see a tremendous loss of value." The retirement system for public employees in California, the largest in the nation, has $1.3 billion invested in commodities. Most of it tracks the S&P commodity index.

That's still just one-half of 1 percent of the fund's total $240 billion in assets, said Michael Schlachter, who advises the California pension fund. He said a collapse in oil or other commodity prices would have little effect on retirees.

Still, a growing chorus of experts is convinced retirement investments are enough to distort prices.

Billionaire George Soros, the airline industry and the International Monetary Fund are all pressuring Congress to curb speculation by large investors. Democrats in Congress say they hope to vote on restrictions by August.

"Your pension fund manager may be using your retirement money to drive up the price of oil," said Rep. Bart Stupak, D-Mich., at a hearing earlier this week on speculation in commodities.

"What would happen if pension fund managers decided to increase their commodity investment by another 20-fold?" he asked.

Speculators put money into commodity markets simply to make money on their investments - unlike commercial investors, who are actually buying or selling orders for physical goods.

Energy analysts say it's unclear what effect speculators have had on oil prices, which climbed briefly to a new record above $142 on Friday before falling back.

But Stupak and other lawmakers have already dashed off more than a dozen proposals to rein in commodity trading, including limiting how many contracts speculators can hold and closing loopholes that allow them to skirt regulations.

Sen. Joe Lieberman, I-Conn., proposed banning pension funds and other large investors from commodities altogether. He dropped the idea after vigorous opposition by an association of public and private pension funds.

Schlachter, who is also managing director for investment consulting firm Wilshire Associates, called the idea "horrendously bad." He said pension funds should not be compared to Wall Street speculators, who assume huge risks every day to maximize returns.

"The pension plans we work with are using commodities only as a long-term hedge against inflation," he said.

Unlike the stock market, where there are a limited number of shares for each company, futures markets have no limits on contracts available. As long as a buyer can find a seller for each contract, investment opportunities are virtually unlimited.

Critics say retirement funds that accumulate contracts are artificially driving up commodity prices. In the case of oil, that means higher gas prices and more expensive food and other goods.

"If they're going to be in the futures market they need to trade rather than take this buy and hold strategy," said Michael Masters, portfolio manager of hedge fund Masters Capital Management. "That is the worst possible thing for the futures market."

Masters and other experts told members of Congress this week that eliminating excessive speculation could drive oil prices down to about $65 a barrel, less than half the current price.

Retirement funds have suffered at the hands of the market before. In 2002, when the stock market swooned after the dot-com crash and 9/11, retirement assets dropped $7 billion, losing 8 percent of their value.

10 comments:

  1. I am trying to understand demand/supply situation and role of speculators in the current run up of oil. But, I am not able to put this complex game in proper perspective. Given the testmony of 'experts', I wonder if they have a good understanding. Most of these 'experts' may be manipulators who are interested in short term moves in either direction and profit from it. What do you think?

    Global demand for oil has not grown much (about 1% per year), in spite of demand from emerging economies such as China and India. China has substabtially increased its domestic oil production and burns a lot of coal for its energy needs. Yet, the oil price has more than doubled.

    Although speculators can't materially impact oil prices (storage problems), I think they can impact for a short term duration and they can extend it further to 'medium term' if they have deep pockets.

    Imagine a scenerio where you (Institutional Investor) are a speculator buying future contracts and on the other side are oil producers (who have both oil and lots of money) who are selling future contracts. At the end of contract expiry, you roll over at a higher price and oil producers are more than eager to sell you the contracts at higher prices. More institutional buyers join to buy and the price of future contract increases at the turn of each expiry. This game may go on until institutional investors have no more money to invest in oil futures or Congress puts a limit on this activity. If congress does not put a limit, what happens (if this is not already happening) when these cash-rich oil producers put money into financial institutions that speculate in oil futures, enabling them to play the game on both sides? What's wrong with this scenario?

    ReplyDelete
  2. HERE ARE TWO INTRESTING ARTICLES ON POTENTIAL OF SOLAR ENERGY IN INDIA AND WORLD WIDE :

    Thar Desert – The NextGen Green Powerhouse of India
    Bottom line is that India is in dire need of power (electricity). The cheap and dirty “solution” is to have coal fired Ultra Mega Power Plants (UMPP), which are being sanctioned and are being built. These UMPPs will emit humongous amount of greenhouse gases (GHG) aiding pollution and global warming. Also, economical coal supplies will not last long. Hence, it is mandatory for us to brace for sustainable energy solutions. Amongst various sustainable energy sources solar energy is basic, unlimited, freely available and guaranteed (available throughout the year in certain parts of our country) and this article discusses the same.

    There are two solar technologies to produce electricity – Photovoltaic (PV) and Thermal. Currently, the PV technology that produces electricity directly from incident solar rays using special grade silicon is quite costly. Also, this technology is suitable for colder regions with ample sunlight as PV cells function better in cold conditions – not ideal for India. The solar thermal technology, on the other hand, is a multipurpose technology. Apart from producing electricity, the same plant can be used for desalination of water. This technology uses the heat component of the solar radiation. It is not very costly.

    Here’s how to get electricity from solar heat:

    Solar rays are concentrated using various techniques like linear fresnel lens (cheapest) or solar tower (promising) or parabolic troughs (proven) or parabolic sterling dishes (ideal for non-grid small plants).
    Water or oil (as heat transfer fluid) is heated using the concentrated solar rays. In case the oil is used then the oil further heats stored water and steam is produced.
    This steam drives a steam turbine and electricity is generated.
    The steam can be used as desalinated water or it can be re-circulated.
    In order to maximize the power output, the plant must be located at a place that receives a “plenty” of sun throughout the year. One such place in India is Thar Desert in west Rajasthan. Following characteristics of Thar Desert make it an ideal location for a solar thermal power plant (STPP):

    Area: 0.28 million km2
    Solar Intensity: approx 6 kWh/m2/day
    Sun Availability: 345-355 days in a year
    Rains occur only for 10-20 days in a year
    There are a few “Strategic Advantages” that Thar Desert presents, which would make it a NexGen Powerhouse of India. These are as follows:

    Strategic Location:
    South Boundary of Thar Desert:
    i. Arabian Sea is just 80-90 kms away and hence a STPP located at the south boundary can double-up as a water desalination plant also providing clean water to local people.

    ii. Gujarat industrial cluster is also very near from the south boundary and hence the power generated can act as a peak power to these industrial units at a reasonable rate.

    North-East Boundary of Thar Desert:
    i. Power hungry states of Punjab, Haryana and Delhi can get peak power especially during hot summers with a STPP located nearby.

    As it is a desert, it is scantly populated and most of the land is government owned and hence land acquisition, relocation of local people and associated issues will be minimal.
    The local people live a tough life as the land is arid and there is no industry. These local people can get a means of livelihood in constructing and maintaining the STPP. STPP will usher-in an era of all round development in this area.
    Initially, the STPPs would provide only “Peak-hour Power” i.e. only during daytime when solar energy is available. Later on, when the cost is reduced, the solar energy storage (in the form of say molten salts) can be built to provide power after sunset.

    So what are we waiting for? Let us make the Thar Desert the next clean and green energy hot spot!

    A back-of-the-envelope calculation: As written in the article, the solar intensity is 6kwh/m2/day or 250w/m2. Considering the cheapest and most inefficient method of linear fresnel lens having efficiency of 15%, the power produced would be 37.5w/m2. i.e. 37.5MW/KM2 or around 1GW/25 KM2. ...and Thar desert area is 2.28 Lac KM2 (0.28 Million KM2)! So now you can imagine the potential!!!

    HERES ANOTHER ARTICLE FROM TOI:
    NAIROBI: Solar power from Africa's deserts could supply all 600 million citizens currently without electricity and even export power to Europe, a green energy conference in Nairobi heard on Thursday.

    The ferocious desert sun could provide the energy equivalent of 1.5 barrels of oil per square kilometre, said Gerhard Knies, project manager for Trans-Mediterranean Renewable Energy Cooperation (TREC), at a meeting of nine African states.

    "The largest source of energy is the solar radiation (and) the best place to receive solar radiation is the desert," he told reporters at the start of meeting of 20 parliamentarians in Kenya.

    "Deserts get 700 times more energy per year than all human kind is using," he explained.

    "It is as if a layer of 25 centimetres of oil is falling down in the deserts year after year" The legislators from Burundi, Djibouti, Ethiopia, Kenya, Madagascar, Rwanda Tanzania, Uganda and the Seychelles are at the conference to discuss energy access for the poor.

    "There is great need to provide the poorest people in east Africa with electricity," said Nicholas Dunlop, founder of the "e-parliament" conference. "But at the same time there is an urgent need to combat climate change."

    Dunlop explained that the technology needed to provide solar thermal energy was simple and clean compared to extracting and processing fossil fuels.

    "A combination of mirrors and pipes to concentrate the sun's heat to boil water and drive an old fashion steam turbine. One you have built your mirrors and pipes ... your costs are finished. The good Lord does the rest," he said.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hi kbs,
    I am not able to understand what you mean to say....
    You mean to say the crude should go up and up?looking at what you wrote in last para it looks like that....
    You write that cash rich Oil producers put money in Fin insti and play both ways?
    But when oil is going up why which is in thier favour why they should play both ways?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Rajeev,

    If I have a commodity (oil) to sell and if I can get a high price for it and that price can be maintained by various means (cartel by means of OPEC is one and selling future contracts may be another)at a low cost to maintain your intersts, then why not?

    kbs

    ReplyDelete
  5. Yes kbs that is a good hedge but then for very small part of people the whole world can go in a prolonged recession maybe from which it can never come out because as per your thinking crude should go up and up....
    Nothing wrong in playing Oil if it goes up and up but we have to see the consequences as well.....
    For the sake of some players we can't take the whole world in recession.....
    Hope you understand what I mean to say as Oil is the most sought after commodities world over....
    Rest assured, this crude speculation is going to end anytime as soon as the US Financial Institution recovers the loss in Subprime Mortgage....

    ReplyDelete
  6. An Intresting article on oil speculation:
    Oil speculation: Why we don't have answers
    There's a lot we don't know about how the oil futures markets now work. Congress should find out.
    By Naomi Prins, contributor
    July 7, 2008: 9:55 AM EDT




    (Fortune) -- The debate over whether oil prices are being driven by speculators in the futures market or by the fundamentals of supply and demand for the physical product slides right on by a central point. The question Congress and regulators should be focusing on isn't who is driving prices, but how prices are being driven.

    And the truth is, there's an awful lot we don't know.

    Futures prices are supposed to bear a relationship to the present, or "spot," prices of various commodities. Exchanges were created with this in mind. Historically, roughly 70% of market participants used exchanges for commercial purposes. So a farmer could "hedge," or protect against, a higher future cost of seed or a lower price for his wheat by buying or selling a futures contract.

    Speculators were always welcome, to some degree, to provide liquidity to the market by taking "the other side of the trade." Heating, airline, and trucking companies used the oil futures market to protect themselves against rising fuel costs. Investment banks facilitated trades. Futures contract prices were based on spot prices. Speculators were outnumbered almost three to one. Transactions were largely transparent.

    That's not our present world, though. Today roughly 30% of market participants on the New York Mercantile Exchange (NYMEX) are identifiable hedgers with a legitimate business purpose. That fact and a twenty-fold increase in capital flowing towards commodity futures during the past five years - growing at a rate of $1 billion in contracts per day - point to a remarkable shift in how futures prices get set, by virtue of who's around to set them.

    Today the number of paper oil barrels traded daily on NYMEX (and that's just the most regulated exchange) is over three times the number of physical barrels consumed daily worldwide.

    Supply and demand of the physical product, by and large, has remained fairly stable. In 2005, global oil production was 84.6 million barrels per day, and consumption was 83.6 million. Today, those numbers are 86.5 million and 86.4 million. That slight tightening hardly justifies the tripled price. So what does? OPEC? The falling dollar? A conspiracy to manipulate the market by speculators?

    Too big, too lax
    The problem is that the futures market has gotten so big, and the trading rules in the markets so lax, that it's not easy to dismiss the speculation theory.

    The infamous December 2000 "Enron loophole" is the topic du jour in Congress. That legislation didn't just make it easier for savvy traders to buck the system. It exempted entire over-the-counter electronic exchanges (where trading takes place directly between parties, without an intermediary broker) from regulatory oversight by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

    As a result, capital zoomed to new unregulated exchanges like Atlanta-based ICE, an American firm operating under U.K. regulation, where trading volume tripled from 2005 to 2008, representing 47.8% of global oil futures trading. And participants in the new electronic markets didn't even have to file "large trade reports" with the CFTC, obscuring trading details across the fastest growing exchanges. That's scary murkiness.

    In addition, while the 1936 Commodity Futures Exchange Act once curtailed excessive speculation, the Enron loophole redefined who a speculator was, and more importantly, wasn't. If investment banks could claim they were "hedging" certain derivative trades, they could avoid speculation limits set by the exchanges altogether.

    "In dark markets, more paths of manipulation are available," says former CFTC trading division head and University of Maryland Law Professor Michael Greenberger. "That may not be happening now, but we just don't know."

    Senators Joe Lieberman, I-Conn., and Susan Collins, R-Maine, last month presented three proposals to regulate oil prices, promising more legislation after the July 4th holiday. They would close the Enron loophole and create a way to add up all positions held by the same party across every exchange, cap the total amount of speculation allowed per commodity, and cut back commodity investments for institutions like pension funds.

    If all three proposals were enacted, they would promote sorely lacking transparency in the futures market. If speculation isn't driving spot oil prices, the laws would have no effect on them. But, to the extent that something funky is going on in the futures market, a clearer picture of the market's participants and of oil's true value would emerge. That might help an ailing economy.

    "You can't solve the debate without looking at what's happening," says Greenberger. "Even people who accept the supply and demand argument, must accept that the markets are too opaque. We need to look at the data, so we can know for sure."

    Nomi Prins is a senior fellow at the public policy group, Demos, and a former managing director at Goldman Sachs. She is author of the bestselling book, Other People's Money: The Corporate Mugging of America

    ReplyDelete
  7. One consideration that appears not to have been mentioned so far is the fact that most of the remaining oil is now the heavy sour grades, for which there is a dearth of refining capacity.

    The NYMEX West Texas Intermediate crude oil benchmark relates to the light, sweet grade of crude, which is declining faster than the heavy, sour, predominantly Middle Eastern, grades.

    So inevitably there will be upward pressure on this oil benchamrk, other things being equal. Unleaded gasoline, one of the distillates of light sweet crude, would first require significant investment in new processing capacity if it is to be sourced from heavy, sour grades.

    This has to be a factor in the current high prices rather than it all being down to the commodity trading activities of some speculators in New York and other global commodity exchanges.

    So if there is more investment in infrastructure to accommodate the heavier sour grades, we could well see a moderation in the crude oil pricesquoted on NYMEX as well as Brent ICE in London.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Ravi again thanks for the article....
    You are doing a wondeful job.....keep it up.....

    ReplyDelete
  9. Rajeev,
    For oil producing countries, high oil price is a two-edged sword.

    High prices are already driving down the demand and causing high inflation, lower growth. Saudi Arabia arranged a meeting of oil consuming countries and announced increase in oil production. It is in their interest to see a 'reasonable' price. Otherwise, inflation, low growth, even recession may lead to less oil demand that may drive down the price drastically. Oil producers are aware of the consequences (OPEC in-figthing, oil producers increasing production above their quota level) and always trying to figure out sustainable price. If they get too greedy, they will pay for it dearly. Remember $10/barrel oil, not too long ago?

    ReplyDelete
  10. A recent article from CNNMoney.com regarding US fUTURE response to oil prices:

    Congress vs. oil prices - round 2
    Deadlock in Washington over oil drilling and tighter rules for speculators may end soon as voters make clear that high gas prices are their top concern.




    Congress vs. oil prices - round 2

    NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- Americans are screaming about gas prices, and Congress says it's listening.

    So far, lawmakers have been unable to get anything done. Democrats are hung up on taxing oil companies and funding renewable energy efforts, while Republicans are pushing for more drilling.

    But the stalemate could break soon. After a holiday recess, many lawmakers returned to Washington this week with a new-found urgency about the gas crisis.

    "Members returned from their districts shell shocked," said Dave Hamilton, director for global warming and energy projects at the Sierra Club. "There could be another energy bill before the elections."

    Congress has been debating four main issues: limiting the role of speculators, increasing domestic oil drilling, taxing Big Oil to fund renewables, and capping greenhouse gas emissions.

    The most likely scenario is one in which the Republicans back down, allowing increased regulation of energy speculators, and the Democrats give up some ground on domestic drilling, according to Congressional staffers and other analysts.

    Here's a look at each of the issues, and what's holding it up:

    Open more areas for domestic drilling. Republicans say it's the only thing that will truly lower gas prices, and have been pushing for more drilling off the East and West Coast and in Alaska.

    Democrats say it would only bring a small amount of oil to market over a long period of time, and efforts would be better spent developing alternatives.

    "Voters are saying the number one issue is gas prices," said David Kreutzer, an energy economist at the Heritage Foundation, a conservative think tank. "It's going to be hard to sit on billions of barrels of oil and not open it up."

    Even the Sierra Club's Hamilton said a compromise bill might involve some limited oil exploration offshore, just to see what's out there.

    Limit the role of speculators. There's no question money from investment banks, pension funds, hedge funds and others that don't ultimately use oil has been pouring into oil markets over the last few years.

    But whether they are chasing a trend - and actually helping keep prices lower by adding liquidity - or driving up prices in their own right is a matter of debate. So far, most experts say speculators are not to blame for the high prices, but many of them agree that the system is very opaque.

    Several bills are floating around Congress to address this issue. At the very least, expect more rules on reporting and disclosure of investment activity in overseas markets - where the government has so far been unable to monitor trades.

    Republicans are also likely to ease their opposition to rules restricting how many oil contracts investors can hold, if the Democrats allow more offshore drilling, said one Republican staffer.

    Tax big oil, use the money to fund renewables. Democrats say oil companies are not investing enough in renewable energy on their own, and that their record profits are obscene.

    Republicans say taxing oil companies will only led to higher prices at the pump.

    It looks like a windfall profits tax seems unlikely to pass. Republican opposition to this remains strong. Plus, several Democrats are from energy-producing states like Texas and Louisiana and are unlikely to support higher taxes on their constituents.

    Cap greenhouse gas emissions. While not directly tied to oil and gas prices, restricting greenhouse gasses would make fossil fuels more expensive, and ideally encourage the development of alternative energy.

    The Lieberman-Warner climate bill recently failed by a wider than expected margin and would not have withstood a presidential veto.

    But it still garnered a substantial amount of votes, and both John McCain and Barack Obama have a cap-and-trade policy as a central part of their energy plans. Watch this space post-November.

    First Published: July 9, 2008: 1:36 PM EDt

    ReplyDelete